Machine Vision Lens for Gasket, O-Ring and Rubber Seal Inspection: How to Measure Diameter, Concentricity, Shape and Edge Defects

Gaskets, O-rings and rubber seals look optically simple because many of them are circular or near-circular components, yet automated inspection can be surprisingly demanding. A single inspection station may need to measure inner diameter and outer diameter, verify ring width, evaluate concentricity, detect ovality, confirm the complete sealing profile, identify a nick or cut along an edge, find excess material, recognize deformation and determine whether a flexible component has retained its expected free-state shape. The component may occupy tens or hundreds of millimetres across the image while the edge defect that determines rejection can be only a fraction of a millimetre. Selecting the correct machine vision lens for gasket inspection, O-ring inspection and rubber seal inspection therefore requires a careful balance between field of view, object sampling, sensor format, focal length and working distance.

Buyers searching for machine vision lens for O-ring inspection, gasket inspection camera lens, rubber seal inspection machine vision, O-ring diameter measurement camera, seal concentricity inspection, gasket edge defect detection, or industrial camera lens for rubber part inspection are generally trying to solve two related problems. First, the complete annular component must remain inside the required FOV. Second, the inner and outer boundaries must occupy enough sensor pixels to measure dimensions and detect small local irregularities reliably. A lens that makes the complete seal easy to see may still provide too little detail for a narrow edge nick, small radial-width variation or slight eccentricity.

Kyptec Automation® provides a broad Machine Vision Lens portfolio covering multiple focal lengths, image formats and optical resolution classes. The current portfolio includes conventional 5 MP, 10 MP and 25 MP Machine Vision Lens families across 2/3", 1" and larger-format options, giving OEM machine builders and system integrators flexibility to select optics according to seal size, required FOV, camera format and dimensional tolerance.

Start With the Smallest Seal Variation That Must Cause Rejection

The first question should not be simply, “What is the diameter of the gasket?” The more important question is, “What is the smallest dimensional or edge variation the inspection system must detect?”

A 60 mm gasket may need only a broad ±1 mm dimensional check in one application, while another process may need to identify a local 0.15 mm edge nick or much smaller radial-width variation. These requirements create very different optical-resolution targets even though the nominal component diameter is identical.

The Machine Vision Lens should therefore be selected around the tightest dimensional tolerance or smallest visible edge defect, while still providing enough field to contain the complete component and normal position variation.

Inner Diameter and Outer Diameter Must Both Be Resolved Clearly

An annular seal has two primary boundaries: the outside perimeter and the inside opening. Both are important.

Outer diameter determines the overall physical size, while inner diameter determines the opening through which another component may pass or seat. If either boundary is poorly represented, the derived dimensional result becomes less stable.

A good machine vision lens for O-ring diameter measurement should therefore provide adequate sharpness and pixel sampling across both the inside and outside circumferences rather than optimizing only the visually dominant external contour.

Radial Seal Width Can Be More Important Than Overall Diameter

For a ring-shaped gasket, local material width is related to the separation between the inner and outer boundaries.

A component can have an apparently correct overall diameter while one region is locally too thin or too thick.

Inspection can therefore compare the radial distance between the two contours at multiple angular positions around the ring.

This makes full-annulus edge quality important. The Machine Vision Lens should provide useful definition around both boundaries throughout the complete circumference.

Calculate Pixels per Millimetre Before Choosing Focal Length

A practical starting relationship is:

Pixels per millimetre = sensor pixels across the inspection direction ÷ physical FOV in millimetres

If a camera provides 4,000 horizontal pixels across a 100 mm physical field, the image scale is approximately 40 pixels/mm.

A 0.25 mm physical edge variation would then correspond to approximately 10 pixels under simplified geometry.

If the same camera covers a 200 mm field, sampling decreases to approximately 20 pixels/mm, and that same 0.25 mm variation occupies only around 5 pixels.

This is why reducing unnecessary FOV can directly improve gasket dimensional inspection and O-ring edge defect detection.

Do Not Waste Sensor Resolution on Excess Background

Flexible seals are often inspected on a fixture, conveyor or inspection surface that occupies much more area than the component itself.

If a 50 mm O-ring sits inside a 150 mm FOV, much of the sensor is being used on empty background.

A tighter legitimate field can place substantially more pixels across the inner and outer boundaries without changing the camera.

The correct FOV should therefore include the maximum part size, actual positioning variation and only the reference area genuinely needed for inspection.

Concentricity Requires Accurate Centers for Two Different Contours

Seal concentricity inspection compares the center of the inside contour with the center of the outside contour.

If these centers do not coincide within the specified tolerance, the material width can vary around the circumference even when both individual diameters appear close to nominal.

This creates a different inspection requirement from simple diameter measurement.

The Machine Vision Lens should preserve both boundaries sufficiently well that each contour can be fitted consistently and their center-to-center displacement can be evaluated.

Concentricity and Ovality Are Not the Same Defect

A gasket can be perfectly concentric but still be oval rather than circular.

Conversely, the inside and outside contours can both be circular yet offset from one another.

The vision system should therefore separate concentricity inspection, roundness or ovality inspection, and simple inner/outer diameter measurement.

Lens selection supports all three by preserving enough contour detail across the complete part, but the geometric interpretation of those boundaries is different.

Flexible Components Must Be Inspected in a Defined Mechanical State

Unlike a rigid machined ring, an O-ring or rubber gasket can deform under very small mechanical forces.

If the component is stretched, compressed or unevenly supported during inspection, its measured diameter and shape may reflect the fixture rather than the manufactured part.

This means dimensional machine vision should define whether the seal is inspected free-state, lightly positioned or mechanically constrained.

The Machine Vision Lens can capture the geometry accurately only if the component presentation itself is repeatable.

O-Ring Twist Can Change the Visible Outline

An O-ring is a three-dimensional toroidal component rather than a flat two-dimensional ring.

If it twists or sits unevenly, parts of the visible boundary may shift in the image even when the manufactured cross-section is acceptable.

This can affect apparent outer diameter, inner diameter and local shape.

The inspection setup should therefore present O-rings consistently and verify that apparent contour changes are actual defects rather than orientation effects.

A 25 MM 10 MP Lens Can Provide Controlled Framing for Medium-Size Seals

For compatible 2/3" camera systems, the Kyptec Automation® KL-1228 25 MM Machine Vision Lens With 10 MegaPixel & 2/3" Format Lens provides a moderate focal-length option. The current official product page specifies 25 mm focal length, 10 MP resolution, 2/3" image format, C-mount and an F2.8–16 aperture range.

This type of configuration can be evaluated when a gasket or O-ring needs controlled framing rather than an excessively wide field. Final suitability depends on physical seal diameter, sensor dimensions, working distance and the minimum dimensional or edge deviation being inspected.

Edge Nicks Need More Resolution Than Seal Presence

Detecting whether a gasket is present is relatively easy because the complete part represents a large image feature.

Detecting a small nick or missing segment along one edge is considerably more demanding.

A 0.2 mm notch in a 100 mm gasket occupies only a tiny fraction of the component circumference.

The inspection should therefore be qualified using the smallest real edge defect rather than assuming that a sharp-looking complete seal image guarantees sufficient defect sensitivity.

Cuts and Tears Can Be Directional

A cut extending radially through the material produces a different image signature from a defect running roughly along the circumference.

The Machine Vision Lens should provide enough sampling in both image directions so different defect orientations remain detectable.

Testing only one conveniently oriented defect can create false confidence.

Representative edge cuts should be evaluated at several angular positions around the seal.

Excess Edge Material Can Distort the Expected Profile

Rubber seals and gaskets can contain unwanted local material that changes the expected inner or outer contour.

For machine vision, the critical question is whether the excess material extends far enough beyond the nominal boundary to create a measurable contour deviation.

This should be evaluated in physical dimensions and converted to expected image pixels.

A tightly controlled FOV usually gives the inspection more sensitivity to small profile changes than an unnecessarily broad field.

Irregularly Shaped Gaskets Need Full-Profile Inspection

Not all gaskets are circular.

Many industrial gaskets contain elongated openings, bolt holes, rectangular sections, tabs or complex sealing profiles.

For these components, one diameter value is not enough. The complete contour may need to be compared against expected geometry.

The Machine Vision Lens should therefore provide consistent image quality across the entire part, particularly where important corners, slots or sealing edges approach the outer image region.

Hole Position Can Be Inspected Relative to the Gasket Profile

A formed gasket may include several mounting or alignment holes.

A hole can be present and correctly sized but still be displaced relative to the gasket's outer profile.

The vision system can measure these positional relationships only if both the hole and the reference contour remain within the field.

This creates a useful optical trade-off: the FOV must include the required reference geometry while still providing sufficient pixels around each opening.

A 35 MM 1-Inch Lens Can Support Tighter Framing From Greater Stand-Off

For compatible 1" camera systems, the Kyptec Automation® KL-1218 35 MM Machine Vision Lens With 10 MegaPixel & 1" Format Lens provides a 35 mm focal length, 10 MP resolution, C-mount, 1" image format and F1.4–16 aperture range.

A 35 mm configuration can be evaluated where the machine requires additional camera stand-off while the seal still needs to occupy a substantial part of the image. This can be useful in inspection equipment where fixtures or material-handling hardware limit how close the camera can be mounted.

Large Gaskets With Small Tolerances Need More Total Image Information

A physically large gasket can be particularly difficult when its allowable dimensional or edge variation remains small.

The complete part needs a large physical FOV, but the defect still needs fine sampling.

Simply selecting a wider field with the same camera reduces pixels/mm.

This is one situation where a higher-resolution compatible camera-lens architecture can become valuable because more total image samples are available across the required component area.

A 12 MM 25 MP Lens Can Support Broad High-Resolution Coverage

For compatible larger-format systems requiring relatively broad coverage, the Kyptec Automation® KL-1236 12 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens provides a 12 mm, 25 MP C-mount option with an F2.8–22 aperture range. The official product title identifies it as a 1.1" format lens.

This focal-length class can be evaluated when a relatively large gasket profile must fit within the available working distance while maintaining a high-resolution optical class. The final pixels/mm should still be calculated from the actual physical FOV.

A 25 MM 25 MP Lens Can Balance Coverage and Fine Edge Sampling

For compatible larger-format high-resolution camera systems, the Kyptec Automation® KL-1240 25 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens provides a 25 mm focal length within Kyptec Automation®'s 25 MP Machine Vision Lens family. The official product page describes the range as intended for high-resolution industrial imaging, inspection and dimensional-analysis applications.

This type of optical configuration can be evaluated when the application needs both meaningful whole-seal coverage and stronger sampling of local inner- or outer-edge deviations.

Higher Resolution Should Be Used to Improve Seal Sampling

A higher-resolution lens-camera system should not be treated as permission to increase the FOV unnecessarily.

If a larger sensor resolution is used merely to include more fixture area, the benefit to gasket measurement can be reduced substantially.

The stronger approach is to keep the field close to the true component requirement and use additional resolution to improve representation of the inner contour, outer contour and local edge defects.

Local Seal-Edge Inspection May Not Require the Whole Component

Some machines need to inspect one particularly critical sealing region rather than measure the complete gasket.

In these applications, a localized FOV may provide substantially higher defect sensitivity.

Instead of devoting the sensor to the entire ring, the camera can concentrate on the region where edge damage, cuts or shape variation matter most.

This is especially useful when the smallest required defect would otherwise occupy too few pixels in a whole-component image.

A 50 MM 25 MP Lens Can Support Localized High-Detail Seal Inspection

Where a localized gasket or seal region needs greater image scale and sufficient camera stand-off is available, the Kyptec Automation® KL-1244 50 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens provides a 50 mm, 25 MP C-mount configuration with an F2.8–22 aperture range.

This type of lens can be evaluated for close analysis of one seal edge, narrow profile region or localized defect zone where whole-part coverage is unnecessary.

Flat Gaskets and O-Rings Do Not Have Identical Focus Requirements

A flat gasket generally presents its main dimensional boundaries close to one plane.

An O-ring can have appreciable cross-sectional height and may not sit perfectly flat.

Rubber seals with lips or molded profiles can contain even greater height variation.

The final focus and aperture should therefore be validated on the actual product geometry rather than treating all sealing components as flat two-dimensional objects.

Aperture Should Balance Focus Tolerance and Edge Detail

Stopping down the aperture can increase usable depth tolerance when a seal contains height variation or sits slightly unevenly.

However, excessively small apertures can reduce fine spatial detail through diffraction.

The correct aperture should be selected using the smallest edge nick or narrowest dimensional feature that must remain detectable across the expected part-height variation.

The goal is sufficient focus tolerance without sacrificing the image detail that determines pass or fail.

Soft Rubber Can Change Shape During Handling

Vacuum pickup, grippers, guides or transport belts can slightly distort a flexible seal before it reaches the inspection position.

If shape or concentricity is being measured, that temporary deformation can be interpreted as a manufacturing error.

Inspection-system designers should therefore consider how the part is handled before evaluating the lens.

Stable part presentation allows the Machine Vision Lens to image the actual product geometry more consistently.

Dark Rubber Can Still Be Measured Geometrically

Black or dark elastomer components can appear visually challenging, but component color does not independently determine focal length.

The lens geometry should still be selected from sensor format, working distance and required FOV.

What changes with surface appearance is how clearly the inner and outer boundaries are distinguishable in the final image.

The optical system should therefore first establish the correct physical image scale, then validate the actual production material.

Surface Texture Should Not Be Confused With Edge Geometry

Many rubber components contain molded texture, lettering or minor surface variation that is unrelated to the sealing boundary.

If the inspection objective is diameter, concentricity or contour quality, the Machine Vision Lens should be evaluated primarily on how clearly it preserves the relevant dimensional edges.

This prevents unnecessary changes in optical setup caused by surface appearance that does not affect the actual acceptance criterion.

Part Rotation Can Reveal Whether Shape Errors Are Real

If an irregular contour rotates with the gasket, the deviation is part-related.

If the apparent distortion remains fixed in image coordinates while the component rotates, the inspection engineer should investigate the optical or setup geometry.

Rotational testing can therefore be useful during commissioning.

However, it does not replace proper lens selection; the smallest edge feature must still be sufficiently sampled in every relevant orientation.

Multiple Seals in One Image Create a Resolution Trade-Off

OEM inspection machines may inspect several O-rings or gaskets simultaneously for higher throughput.

This increases the total required FOV and reduces the number of pixels available to each component.

The smallest diameter tolerance, concentricity error or edge defect should therefore be evaluated against the complete multi-part FOV, not against the dimensions of one individual seal.

If each part becomes too small in the image, a higher-resolution optical system or fewer components per image may provide better inspection reliability.

Seal Orientation and Position Tolerance Consume FOV

An irregular gasket may enter the inspection area translated or rotated.

The camera field must then be large enough to accommodate every valid orientation.

That additional margin directly reduces pixels/mm.

Mechanical positioning therefore has an important relationship with optical resolution: better presentation can permit a tighter FOV and provide more sensor pixels to the same physical edge defect.

Calibration Should Be Performed After Final Optical Setup

If the system reports inner diameter, outer diameter, hole spacing or another physical measurement, calibration should be performed only after the Machine Vision Lens position, working distance, focus and aperture are finalized.

Changing camera distance later can alter magnification and therefore the relationship between pixels and millimetres.

For precision dimensional inspection, the product plane should remain stable after calibration.

Qualification Should Use Limit Samples, Not Only Perfect Rings

A perfectly round reference O-ring confirms that the system can image a good component, but it does not demonstrate the minimum defect sensitivity.

Final validation should include samples with the smallest acceptable-to-reject changes in diameter, eccentricity, ovality, local edge nicks and profile irregularity.

These samples should be tested at several positions and orientations within the valid image field.

This provides a much stronger basis for approving the Machine Vision Lens than general visual sharpness alone.

Why Kyptec Automation® Is a Practical Choice for Gasket, O-Ring and Rubber Seal Inspection

Kyptec Automation® provides a broad Machine Vision Lens collection spanning multiple focal lengths, camera formats and optical resolution classes. The current portfolio includes conventional 5 MP, 10 MP and 25 MP Machine Vision Lens families, providing OEM machine builders and system integrators with useful flexibility for both complete seal measurement and localized high-detail inspection.

For compatible 2/3" systems requiring moderate controlled framing, Kyptec Automation® KL-1228 25 MM Machine Vision Lens With 10 MegaPixel & 2/3" Format Lens provides a 25 mm, 10 MP configuration. Where additional stand-off is needed on a compatible 1" system, Kyptec Automation® KL-1218 35 MM Machine Vision Lens With 10 MegaPixel & 1" Format Lens provides a 35 mm alternative.

For large gaskets or demanding applications where whole-part coverage and small edge tolerances must coexist, Kyptec Automation® KL-1236 12 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens offers broader high-resolution framing, while Kyptec Automation® KL-1240 25 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens provides a more moderate high-resolution focal length. Where localized inspection and greater image scale are required, Kyptec Automation® KL-1244 50 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens provides a longer focal-length high-resolution option.

This range enables Kyptec Automation® Machine Vision Lens selection to be based on actual seal diameter, required concentricity, smallest edge defect, sensor format and working distance rather than forcing one focal length to handle every elastomer-inspection requirement.

Frequently Asked Questions About Machine Vision Lenses for Gasket, O-Ring and Rubber Seal Inspection

1. What is the best Machine Vision Lens for O-ring inspection?

The correct lens depends on the O-ring outside diameter, inside diameter, smallest required dimensional tolerance, edge-defect size, sensor format and working distance. Whole-ring measurement normally benefits from a field that includes the complete component with only necessary position margin, while localized defect inspection can use tighter framing. Kyptec Automation® provides several focal lengths and resolution classes so the optical configuration can be matched to the actual seal geometry rather than selected from nominal diameter alone.

2. How can machine vision measure O-ring inner diameter and outer diameter?

The system identifies the inner and outer contours in the captured image and fits the corresponding geometric boundaries. Accurate measurement requires enough pixels across both contours, stable part presentation and calibration at the final working distance. The Machine Vision Lens should therefore provide a controlled field that uses the sensor efficiently rather than surrounding the O-ring with unnecessary empty area.

3. How is gasket concentricity measured with machine vision?

The inspection determines the center of the outer gasket contour and independently determines the center of the internal opening. The distance between these centers provides a measure of eccentricity. This requires both boundaries to remain sufficiently sharp and complete, which is why lens quality across the entire annular region matters rather than only center-image sharpness.

4. Can machine vision detect an oval O-ring?

Yes. Instead of relying on one diameter, the system can evaluate the contour at multiple orientations or fit an ellipse to the observed boundary. The Machine Vision Lens must provide adequate resolution around the complete component so genuine ovality can be separated from image blur, part tilt or inconsistent mechanical presentation.

5. Is a 25 mm lens suitable for gasket and rubber seal inspection?

It can be when the resulting FOV suits the component dimensions. For compatible 2/3" systems, Kyptec Automation® KL-1228 25 MM Machine Vision Lens With 10 MegaPixel & 2/3" Format Lens provides a 25 mm, 10 MP C-mount configuration with an F2.8–16 aperture range. Final selection should be based on the actual seal diameter, sensor dimensions, working distance and smallest required edge variation.

6. Can machine vision detect small cuts or nicks on an O-ring edge?

Yes, provided the defect is visible from the camera direction and occupies enough sensor pixels. Small edge cuts can be much harder to detect than the complete O-ring itself, so lens selection should be based on the minimum rejectable nick rather than simple presence inspection. Real defect samples should be tested at several angular positions around the ring.

7. Why does an O-ring sometimes look oval even when its dimensions are correct?

The component may be stretched, tilted, twisted or unevenly supported during inspection. Because an O-ring is flexible, its apparent outline can change under relatively small mechanical forces. Before changing the lens, verify that the part is being presented in a repeatable mechanical state and that the camera views the intended inspection plane consistently.

8. Can one Machine Vision Lens inspect both circular O-rings and irregular gaskets?

Potentially, provided the required FOV, sensor format and smallest feature are compatible for both component types. Irregular gaskets can demand more image area because tabs, corners or mounting holes extend beyond a circular boundary. Each product family should therefore be checked independently for pixels/mm rather than assuming that a setup optimized for one O-ring automatically suits every gasket.

9. When should a 25 MP Machine Vision Lens be considered for gasket inspection?

A higher-resolution lens-camera configuration becomes useful when a physically large gasket must remain fully visible while small dimensional or edge variations still need substantial sampling. Kyptec Automation®'s current portfolio includes several 25 MP Machine Vision Lens focal lengths for compatible larger-format systems, allowing broader and tighter fields within the same high-resolution class.

10. Which Kyptec Automation® lens can be considered for a broad high-resolution gasket FOV?

For compatible larger-format systems, Kyptec Automation® KL-1236 12 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens provides a 12 mm, 25 MP C-mount configuration with an F2.8–22 aperture range. It can be evaluated where a large seal or gasket profile needs broad coverage while maintaining a high-resolution optical class.

11. Which high-resolution lens can provide more controlled framing for seal measurement?

For a compatible larger-format system, Kyptec Automation® KL-1240 25 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens provides a 25 mm focal-length option in Kyptec Automation®'s 25 MP family. It can be considered where a gasket should occupy more of the sensor than with a wider lens while still retaining whole-part coverage.

12. Can a 50 mm lens be used for localized gasket edge inspection?

Yes. Where sufficient working distance is available and the inspection is concentrated on a smaller region, Kyptec Automation® KL-1244 50 MM Machine Vision Lens With 25 MegaPixel & 1.1" Format Lens provides a 50 mm, 25 MP C-mount option with an F2.8–22 aperture range. Tighter framing can allocate substantially more sensor pixels to a critical seal edge or narrow local profile.

13. Can machine vision measure gasket radial width?

Yes. Once the inner and outer contours are located, the local distance between them can be evaluated around the component. This can identify a gasket that is locally too thin or too thick even when its average inner and outer diameters appear acceptable. Adequate image sampling of both boundaries is essential for repeatable results.

14. Why does gasket measurement change when the rubber part is stretched?

Stretching changes the actual component geometry. Flexible elastomers do not behave like rigid metal parts, so dimensional measurement should be performed in a defined mechanical state. If the fixture applies variable tension, the camera will correctly image different shapes but the measurement may no longer represent the intended free-state dimensions.

15. Can multiple O-rings be inspected in one camera image?

Yes, but increasing the number of rings increases the overall required FOV and reduces the number of pixels available to each component. The smallest diameter tolerance, concentricity error or edge nick should be calculated using the complete multi-part image field. If each seal becomes too small in the image, fewer parts per frame or a higher-resolution optical system may be more appropriate.

16. What information should I provide before buying a Machine Vision Lens for gasket or O-ring inspection?

Provide minimum and maximum outer diameter, inner diameter, required dimensional tolerance, permitted concentricity error, smallest edge defect, component thickness or height variation, camera sensor format and resolution, available working distance, product-position tolerance and whether one or several seals must fit in the image. These parameters allow a Kyptec Automation® Machine Vision Lens to be evaluated according to actual geometry and pixels/mm rather than focal length alone.

17. Where can I compare Kyptec Automation® Machine Vision Lenses for gasket and rubber seal inspection?

The Kyptec Automation® Machine Vision Lens collection includes multiple focal lengths across conventional 5 MP, 10 MP and 25 MP resolution classes and several industrial image formats. Buyers can establish the required seal FOV, smallest dimensional tolerance, edge-defect size, sensor format and working distance first, then compare Kyptec Automation® Machine Vision Lens options that provide enough full-profile coverage without unnecessarily sacrificing pixel density.

Design Seal Inspection Around Both Boundaries and the Smallest Edge Defect

Reliable gasket, O-ring and rubber seal inspection requires more than detecting a circular component in the camera image. Inner diameter, outer diameter, radial width, concentricity, ovality and local edge defects all depend on different aspects of the same component geometry. A complete seal may look sharp while a small nick, slight center offset or local width variation remains below the useful resolution of the vision system. Lens selection should therefore be driven by the smallest dimensional or contour change that determines production acceptance.

The strongest optical design starts with maximum component dimensions, minimum dimensional tolerance, required concentricity and smallest edge defect. Actual part-position variation is then added to establish the minimum practical FOV. Pixels per millimetre can be calculated from the camera resolution, after which sensor format, focal length and working distance are chosen so the seal uses the available sensor efficiently. Because elastomer components can deform, inspection should also define the mechanical state in which measurements are taken and qualify the setup using real limit samples rather than only ideal reference parts.

Kyptec Automation® provides a comprehensive Machine Vision Lens portfolio spanning multiple focal lengths, sensor formats and 5 MP, 10 MP and 25 MP optical resolution classes. By matching the appropriate Kyptec Automation® Machine Vision Lens to gasket or O-ring dimensions, required concentricity, minimum edge defect, camera format and available working distance, OEM machine builders and system integrators can establish a stronger optical foundation for automated diameter measurement, shape verification, concentricity analysis and rubber seal edge-quality inspection.